Galen and neurosurgical procedures

Authors

  • Jeremy Ganz Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, UK 35–43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, United Kingdom Author

Keywords:

Galen, surgical technique, dissection, experimentation, neurosurgery

Abstract

There are two documented areas where Galen's competence with neurosurgical procedures is evident. The first area is his clinical work, as described in his treatise *De methodo medendi* (Method of Medicine). Galen viewed his writing as an extension and clarification of Hippocratic texts. His detailed comments on the various surgical instruments and their proper use demonstrate his competence and concern as a surgeon.

The second area is Galen's experiments, which involved both dissection and vivisection of animals. He identified and described a large vein deep within the brain, later named the "vein of Galen," and coined the term "pineal gland," which he believed played a role in moving the psychic pneuma from the lateral ventricles to the cerebellar ventricle. His superb dissection technique allowed him to trace the course of the recurrent laryngeal nerve accurately.

Galen's choice of pigs and goats for his experimental surgeries, rather than apes, stemmed from sentimental reasons. His experimental procedures included compressing and then incising the cerebral ventricles. Some animals survived these operations, which were performed without modern surgical tools such as effective brain haemostasis, suction, or advanced lighting. This suggests that Galen managed to operate without causing intradural hemorrhage and was likely able to manipulate the brain without causing irreversible damage.

Although Galen would not be considered a neurosurgeon by modern standards, his neurosurgical techniques were advanced for his time and would likely be deemed acceptable even today.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Flamm E.S. Percival Pott: an 18th century neurosurgeon.

J. Neurosurg. 1992; 76: 319‒326.

Lichterman B. Emergence and Early Development of

Russian Neurosurgery (1890s to 1930s). J Hist Neurosci.

; 16: 123–137.

Galen. Method of Medicine. Book VI. Johnston I.,

Horsley G.H.R. (eds, transl.). Cambridge Mass,

Harvard University Press, 2011: 215–235.

Galen. De usu partium. Translated from the Greek

by May. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press,

Hankinson R.J. The Man and his Work. In: Hankinson

R.J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Galen.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008: 1–33.

Norman J. The Library of Pergamum (Pergamon) is

Founded (197 BCE – 159 BCE). Available at: http://www.historyofinformation.com/expanded.php?id=173

Accessed 11th December 2014.

Chambers E. Chambers Cyclopaedia of Arts and Sciences.

Vol 1. London: Longman Charles Rivington, 1728; 364 p.

Ganz J. Hippocrates, Celsus and Galen: Head Injury, the

Brain, and the Bone. Istoriya meditsiny. 2015; 2 (1): 92–103.

Lloyd G.E.R. Methods and Problems in Greek Science.

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991; 358 p.

Rocca J.Anatomy.In: Hankinson RJ (ed.). The Cambridge

Companion to Galen. Cambridge, Cambridge University

Press, 2008: 242–262.

Wilkins R.H. Neurosurgical Techniques: An Overview.

In: Greenblatt S.H. (ed) A history of neurosurgery.

American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Park

Ridge Illinois. 1997: 193–212.

Perrini P., Lanzino G., Parenti G.F. Niels Stensen

(1638‒1686): Scientist, Neuroanatomist, and Saint.

Neurosurgery. 2010; 67(1): 3–9.

Clarke E., Dewhurst K. An Illustrated History of

Brain Function. Oxford, Sandford Publications,

Published

2015-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles