The development of the system of clinical obstetrics in Russia (from the late eighteenth to the early twentieth century)*
Keywords:
history of obstetrics, history of midwifery, clinical obstetrics, history of childbirth, maternity shelter, birthing cultureAbstract
This article examines the specific features of the development of clinical obstetrics in Russia from the late eighteenth to the early twentieth century. The research is based on statistical data on the birth rate, reporting material from inpa-tient maternity facilities and ethnographic information on birthing culture, and uses approaches and methods from the anthropology of gender, women’s history, and modern social history (including the concept of medicalisation).
e show that the emergence of clinical obstetrics in Russia was linked to the development of medical science and the need for doctors to gain practical skills in midwifery. With obstetrics a taboo subject and childbirth still a “woman’s space” within popular midwifery, physicians trained in theory were unable to test out their knowledge in practice.
he first maternity clinics were founded in the biggest Russian cities, with universities, in the second half of the eigh-teenth century, and became not just a means of assisting poor women, but also educational and experimental spaces for obstetrics. The development of clinical obstetrics in the provinces in the second half of the nineteenth century was influenced by the rural and urban reforms. By the start of the twentieth century, there was a significant gulf in attitudes to assistance at childbirth: in the capital, hospital births began to prevail over home births, while traditional midwifery clung on in the provinces, where generally births took place in inpatient facilities hospitals only in patho-logical cases. During this period, various types of obstetrics institutes emerged, even including ones owned by private individuals. A significant proportion of the funding for inpatient maternity facilities came from public donations.
Downloads
References
Akushersko-ginekologicheskie uchrezhdeniya Rossii
[Obstetric and gynecological institutions in Russia]
(1910) Saint Petersburg. 328 p. (In Russ.)
Blokhina NN (2008) K istorii rodovspomozheniya v
Sankt-Peterburge (vtoraya polovina XIX– nachalo
XX veka) [To the history of obstetrics in Saint Petersburg (the second half of the 19th to the early 20th
century)]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya [Obstetrics and
gynecology] 5: 66–68. (In Russ.)
Davis-Floyd RE (1994) The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Social Science
and Medicine 38(8): 1125–1140. DOI: 10.1016/0277-
(94)90228-3
Dobronravov VA (1886) Otchet lechebnitsy doktora
meditsiny i akushera V.A. Dobronravova [Report of
the hospital of Doctor of Medicine and obstetrician
V.A. Dobronravov]. Kiev: Univ. tip. 159 p. (In Russ.)
Dvadtsat pyat let deyatelnosti Mariinskogo rodovspomogatelnogo doma (1870–1895) [Twenty five years of activity of the Mariinsky maternity hospital (1870‒1895)]
(1895) Saint Petersburg: Gub. tip. 56 p. (In Russ.)
Foucault M (1973) The Birth of the Clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. London: Tavistock Publications. 215 p.
Gorodskie rodilnye priyuty v S.-Peterburge v 1868–
gg. [City maternity shelters in St. Petersburg in
‒1885] (1887) Saint Petersburg: Tip. Shredera.
p. (In Russ.)
Gruzdev SA (1898) Istoricheskiy ocherk kafedry akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney Imperatorskoy voenno-meditsinskoy akademii i soedinennoy s neyu
akademicheskoy akushersko-ginekologicheskoy kliniki
[Historical essay of the Department of Obstetrics and
Women’s Diseases of the Imperial Military Medical
Academy and the associated academic obstetric and
gynecological clinic]. Saint Petersburg: Tip. P.P. Soykina. (In Russ.)
Jakovenko TG (2013) Ohrana materinstva i mladenchestva v Sankt-Peterburge [Protection of motherhood and
infancy in Saint Petersburg]. Saint Petersburg: Lambert. 304 p. (in Russ.)
Kakushkin NM (1917) Novye puti v dele rodovspomozheniya v gor. Saratove [New ways in the case of
maternity care in Saratov]. Ohrana materinstva i mladenchestva [Protection of motherhood and infancy]
: 145–170. (In Russ.)
Leavitt JW (1986) Brought to Bed: Childbearing in America 1750–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 304 p.
Mitsyuk NA, Pushkareva NL, Belova AV (2019) The history of childbirth as the subject of social and humanitarian studies in Russia. History of Medicine 6(3):
–157. DOI: 10.17720/2409-5834.v6.3.2019.04d
Mitsyuk NA, Pushkareva NL (2015) Domashnie rody v
rossiyskikh dvoryanskikh semyakh (konets 19 ‒ nachalo 20 v.) [Home childbirth in Russian noble families
(late 19th ‒ early 20th centuries)]. Etnograficheskoe
obozrenie [Ethnographic review] 5: 167–183. (In
Russ.)
Mitsyuk NA, Pushkareva NL, Ostapenko VM (2017) The
emergence of professional obstetric aid in Smolensk
province in the 19th–early 20th century. History of
Medicine 4(4): 359–373. DOI: 10.17720/2409-5834.
v4.4.2017.06f
Otchet akusherskoy shkoly i rodovspomogatelnogo i
zhenskogo otdeleniy pri ney doktora V.A. Brodskogo
za 1910–1911 gg. [Report of the obstetric school and
the maternity and women’s departments under it by
doctor V.A. Brodsky for 1910‒1911] (1911) Moscow.
p. (In Russ.)
Otchety rodovspomogatelnykh uchrezhdeniy, nahodyashchihsya v vedenii Moskovskogo gorodskogo obshchestvennogo upravleniya za 1914 g. [Reports of
obstetric institutions under the jurisdiction of the
Moscow City Public Administration for 1914] (1914)
Moscow: Gor. tip. 253 p. (In Russ.)
Rein GE (1906) Rodovspomozhenie v Rossii: Sbornik
dokladov na IX Pirogovskom syezde [Maternity care
in Russia. Collection of reports at the 9th PirogovCongress]. Saint Petersburg: Tip. Ministerstva putey
soobshcheniya. 144 p. (In Russ.)
Sto let deyatelnosti Imperatorskogo klinicheskogo povivalnogo instituta (1797–1897) [One hundred years of
activity of the Imperial Clinical Midwifery Institute
(1797‒1897)] (1898) Ed. D. Ott. Saint Petersburg: Gos.
tip. 1281 p. (In Russ.)
Vrachebnye i sanitarnye uchrezhdeniya gor. Sankt-Peterburga [Medical and sanitary institutions in St. Petersburg] (1910) Saint Petersburg: Gor. tip. 66 p. (In Russ.)
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.