Boorse and Galen: an overlooked connection

Authors

  • Dmitry A. Balalykin Non-commercial charitable organization The Classical Studies Foundation 2 Gamsonovsky Pereulok, Moscow 115191, Russia Author

Keywords:

history of medicine, philosophy of medicine, naturalistic theory, Galen, Christopher Boorse, teleology, functionalism

Abstract


This article examines the important issue of how the philosophy and history of medicine influence each other and the need to take account of this when considering fundamental concepts of ontological significance to medical science.
he author analyses one of the most significant modern theories in the philosophy of medicine — the naturalistic theory put forward by Boorse. The latter suggests regarding how fully the function of a particular body part, organ,or the organism as a whole, is performed as a criterion by which the organism’s condition can be assessed: whether it is healthy or sick depends on how fully particular functions are performed. Boorse’s theory refers to the statistically typical level of a particular function for a biological species overall, and effectively suggests that functions can be quan-titatively assessed. The functionalist approach has always been extremely important to the development of medical theory and practice. The author notes that Boorse’s theory has a strong ontological connection to the teleological tradition in the history of medicine, first clearly expressed by Galen. The link between Boorse’s ideas and Galen’s views is substantial, but, apparently, no one, not even Boorse himself, has previously recognised it. The author asks whether it is possible to put forward a convincing modern philosophical theory of an applied science such as medicine while ignoring its history.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aas S, Wasserman D (2016) Disability, Disease, and

Health Sufficiency. What is Enough?: Sufficiency, Justice, and Health. Eds. C. Fourie, A. Rid.

Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:

oso/9780199385263.003.0010

Amundson R (2000) Against Normal Function. Stud Hist

Phil Biol & Biomed Sci 31(1): 33–53. DOI: 10.1016/

s1369-8486(99)00033-3

Amundson R (2001) Adaptation, Development, and the

Quest for Common Ground. Adaptation and Optimality. Eds. S.H. Orzack, E. Sober. New York: Cambridge University Press. P. 303‒334.

Amundson R (2005) Disability, ideology, and quality of

life: a bias in biomedical ethics. Quality of life and

human difference. Eds. D. Wasserman, J. Bickenbach,

R. Wachbroit. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press. P. 101‒124.

Amundson R (2009) Evolutionary developmental biology. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and

Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-Q123-1

Amundson R (2010) Quality of Life, Disability, and

Hedonic Psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40(4): 374‒392. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-

2010.00437.x

Amundson R (2012) Homology and Homoplasy: A Philosophical Perspective. Encyclopedia of life sciences.

Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published online: 15 October 2012. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.

a0003445.pub2

Amundson R (2015) Preface. Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on

Evolution and Development. Ed. A.C. Love. Berlin:

Springer. P. V‒X.

Amundson R, Tresky S (2007) On a Bioethical Challenge to

Disability Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

(6): 541—561. DOI: 10.1080/03605310701680924

Amundson R, Tresky S (2008) Bioethics and Disability

Rights: Conflicting Values and Perspectives. Bioethical

Inquiry 5(2—3): 111–123. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-008-

-3

Balalykin DA (2015) Meditsina Galena: traditsiya Gippokrata i ratsionalnost antichnoy naturfilosofii [Galen’s medicine: the Hippocratic tradition and the

rationality of ancient natural philosophy]. Galen.

Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 2. Ed., comp., introd., and

annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya

meditsina. P. 5‒106. (In Russ.)

Balalykin DA, Shcheglov AP, Shok NP (2014) Galen:

vrach i filosof [Galen: a doctor and philosopher]. Moscow: Vest. 416 p. (In Russ.)

Bolton D (2008) What is Mental Disorder? An essay in

philosophy, science, and values. Oxford University

Press.

Boorse C (1977) Health as a Theoretical Concept. Philosophy of Science 44 (4): 542‒573. DOI: 10.1086/288768

Boorse C (1997) A rebuttal on health. What Is Disease?

Eds. J.M. Humber, R.F. Almeder. Totowa, NJ: Humana

Press. P. 1‒134.

Boorse C (2002) A rebuttal on functions. Functions: New

Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology.

Eds. A. Ariew, R. Cummins, M. Perlman. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 63‒112.

Boorse C (2011) Concepts of health and disease. Philosophy of Medicine. Ed.F. Gifford. North Holland.

P. 13‒64.

Boorse C (2014) A second rebuttal on health. J Med

Philos 39(6): 683‒724. DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhu035

Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia (1821–1833) Ed.

K.G. Kühn. Leipzig.

Cooper R (2002) Disease. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (2):

‒282. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00018-3

Galen K (1971) O naznachenii chastey chelovecheskogo

tela [The Function of the Parts of the Body]. Transl.

by S.P. Kondratev, ed. by V.N. Ternovskiy. Moscow:

Meditsina. (In Russ.)

Galen (2005) De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis. Galen.

On the doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. Ed., transl.,

comm. Ph. De Lacy. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Galen (2014a) Sposob raspoznavaniya i lecheniya strastey

lyuboy, v tom chisle i svoey sobstvennoy, dushi [The

Diagnosis and Treatment of the Aff ections and Errors

Peculiar to Each Person’s Soul]. Galen. Sochineniya

[Works]. Vol. 1. Ed., comp., introd., and annot. bу

D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Vest. P. 214‒248. (In Russ.)

Galen (2014b) O raspoznavanii i lechenii zabluzhdeniy

vsyakoy dushi [The Diagnosis and Cure of the Soul’s

Passions]. Galen. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 1. Ed.,

comp., introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin Moscow:

Vest. P. 281‒302. (In Russ.)

Galen (2014c) O zavisimosti svoystv dushi ot temperamentov tela [The Capacities of the Soul Depend on the

Mixtures of the Body]. Galen. Sochineniya [Works].

Vol. 1. Ed., comp., introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Vest. P. 339‒376. (In Russ.)

Galen (2015a) Iskusstvo meditsiny [The Art of Medicine]. Galen. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 2. Ed., comp.,

introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina. P. 172‒230. (In Russ.)

Galen (2015b) K Patrofilu, o sostave meditsinskogo

iskusstva [On the Constitution of the Art of Medicine]. Galen. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 2. Ed., comp.,

introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina. P. 292‒334. (In Russ.)

Galen (2015c) O raznovidnostyakh bolezney [Types of

Diseases]. Galen. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 2. Ed.,

comp., introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow:

Prakticheskaya meditsina. P. 578‒604. (In Russ.)

Galen (2015d) O raznovidnostyakh simptomov [Distinctions in Symptoms]. Galen. Sochineniya [Works].

Vol. 2. Ed., comp., introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina. P. 700‒727.

(In Russ.)

Galen (2015e) Fragmenty kommentariya k “Timeyu”

Platona [Commentary on Plato’s “Timaeus”]. Galen.

Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 2. Ed., comp., introd., and

annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya

meditsina. P. 759‒781. (In Russ.)

Galen (2016) Ob ucheniyakh Gippokrata i Platona

[On the doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato]. Books

–5. Galen. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 3. Ed., comp.,

introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina. 560 p. (In Russ.)

Galen (2017) Ob ucheniyakh Gippokrata i Platona

[On the doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato]. Books

–9. Galen. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 4. Ed., comp.,

introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina. 494 p. (In Russ.)

Galen (2018) O estestvennykh funktsiyakh [Natural

Faculties]. Galen. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 5. Ed.,

comp., introd., and annot. bу D.A. Balalykin. Moscow:

Prakticheskaya meditsina. P. 183‒305. (In Russ.)

Guerrero JD (2010) On a naturalist theory of health:

a critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (3): 272‒278. DOI:

1016/j.shpsc.2009.12.008

Kuhn TS (2014) After “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Moscow: AST. 443 с. (In Russ.)

Kukla R (2014) Medicalization, “Normal Function,” and

the Definition of Health. The Routledge Companion to Bioethics. Eds. J.D. Arras, E. Fenton, R. Kukla.

Abingdon: Routledge. Routledge Handbooks Online.

DOI: 10.4324/9780203804971.ch39

Nordenfelt L (1987) On the Nature of Health: An ActionTheoretic Approach. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel.

Silvers A (1998) A Fatal Attraction to Normalizing: Treating Disabilities as Deviation from “Species-Typical”

Functioning. Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and

Social Implications. Ed.E. Parens. Washington, DC:

Georgetown University Press. P. 95—123.

Schroeder SA (2013) Rethinking health: healthy or

healthier than? British Journal for the Philosophy of

Science 64(1): 131‒159. DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axs006

Schwartz PH (2007) Defining dysfunction: natural selection, design, and drawing a line. Philosophy of Science

(3): 364‒385. https://doi.org/10.1086/521970

Temkin O (1973a) Health and Disease. Dictionary of

the History of Ideas. Vol. 2. New York: Scribner’s.

P. 395‒407.

Temkin O (1973b) Galenism: Rise and Decline of a Medical Philosophy. Ithaca, London: Cornell University

Press.

Vácha J (1978) Biology and the Problem of Normality.

Scientia 113: 823–846.

Venkatapuram S (2011) Health Justice: An argument

from the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Polity

Press.

Vernadsky VI (1989) Biosphere and noosphere. Moscow:

Nauka. (In Russ.)

Vernadsky VI (1991) Scientific thought as a planetary

phenomenon. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A. Balalykin, D. (2021). Boorse and Galen: an overlooked connection. History of Medicine, 7(1). https://historymedjournal.com/HOM/index.php/medicine/article/view/275