Galen’s understanding of the digestive system in the context of the commensurability of medical knowledge in different periods
Keywords:
history of medicine, ancient medicine, Galen, digestive system, stomach, oesophagus, intestine, bowelAbstract
The foundations of ancient rational medicine were laid by Hippocrates, but the credit for rethinking medicine as a comprehensive system of protoscientific knowledge belongs to Galen. Before him, medicine had no unified system of thought on the basic princi-ples of the structure of living things, and no systemic approach to clinical practice, based on the apodictic method. In this article, I examine Galen’s teachings on the digestive system (one of the key aspects of his system) in terms of the “commensurability” of the ideas of ancient medicine and modern science. An analysis of the information in Galen’s works indicates that his system of theory and practice is substantially commensurable with the principles of modern medicine: many aspects of modern theory and practice represent a development of Galen’s ideas.
A comparative analysis of Galen’s reconstructed views and those found in modern medicine calls for the use of tools from philosophy and the history of science to enable a correct interpretation of the historical medical texts. Such fundamental concepts include “type of rationality” and “scientific worldview”. This research is based on extant texts by Galen, primarily his two treatises On the Natural Faculties and On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, which may be regarded as fundamental to reconstructing Galen’s views on physiology and anatomy. Galen constructs a comprehensive system rather than simply listing individual facts he knows. The treatises in question underline the comprehensive and systemic nature of the great Roman physician’s arguments,which were to a large extent supported by experiment.
Downloads
References
Balalykin DA (2005) Istoriya razvitiya khirurgii zheludka v Rossii v XIX–
XX vv. [The history of the development of gastric surgery in Russia
in the 19th–20th centuries]. Moscow: OAO “Izdatelstvo “Meditsina”.
p. (In Russ.)
Balalykin DA (2008) Rossiyskie nauchnye prioritety v issledovanii i eksperimentalnoy khirurgii zheludka v XIX – nachale XX v. [Russian
scientific priorities in the study and experimental surgery of the
stomach in the 19th – early 20th century]. Moscow: KNORUS. 240
p. (In Russ.)
Balalykin DA (2014) Galen i galenizm v istorii meditsiny [Galen and
Galenism in the history of medicine]. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 1.
Edited, complied, introduced by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Vest. P.
–91. (In Russ.)
Balalykin DA (2015) Meditsina Galena: traditsiya Gippokrata i ratsionalnost antichnoy naturfilosofii [Galen’s medicine: the Hippocratic
tradition and rationality of ancient natural philosophy]. Sochineniya
[Works]. Vol. 2. Edited, complied, introduced and annotated by D.A.
Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina. P. 5–106. (In Russ.)
Balalykin DA (2016) Оn the problem of periodization in the history of
medicine. History of Medicine 3 (3): 203–221. doi: 10.17720/2409-
v3.3.2016.21n
Balalykin DA (2017a) The History of Russian Surgery: Selected Pages.
Moscow: LLC Publishing house “Practical medicine”. 288 p.
Balalykin DA (2017b) O teleologicheskom printsipe, nauchnom metode
i upravlyayushchikh silakh dushi v meditsine Galena [On the teleological principle, the scientific method, and controlling forces of
the soul in Galen’s medicine]. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 4. Edited,
complied, introduced by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya
meditsina. P. 5–100. (In Russ.)
Balalykin DA (2018d) O Galene, Erasistrate i osobennostyakh preemstvennosti znaniy v antichnoy meditsine [About Galen, Erasistratus and features of continuity of knowledge in ancient medicine].
Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 5. Edited, complied, introduced and annotated by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina. P.
–60. (In Russ.)
Balalykin DA, Shok NP (2016) The apodictic method in the tradition
of ancient Greek rational medicine: Hippocrates, Aristotle, Galen. History of Medicine 3 (4): 377–391. doi: 10.17720/2409-5834.
v3.4.2016.37z
Balalykin DА (2018a) What do we know about Erasistratus?
Part 1. Нistory of Medicine 5 (1): 3–13. doi: 10.l7720/2409-5834.
v5.l.2018.0la
Balalykin DА (2018b) What do we know about Erasistratus? Part
Нistory of Medicine 5 (2): 154–167. doi: 10.17720/2409-5583.
v5.2.2018.01a
Balalykin DА (2018c) What do we know about Erasistratus? Part
History of Medicine 5 (3): 213–220.
Bernard C (2010) Vvedenie k izucheniyu opytnoy meditsiny [Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine]. Moscow. 314 p. (In
Russ.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
