What do we know about Erasistratus? Part 2

Authors

  • Dmitry A. Balalykin FSSBI “N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health” 12 Vorontsovo Pole St., building 1, Moscow 105064, Russia Author

Keywords:

history of medicine, ancient medicine, Erasistratus, Methodic doctors

Abstract

Erasistratus is one of the greatest figures in the history of ancient medicine. He and Herophilos were outstanding physicians,who made a major contribution to the development of medicine. While historians have noted publication of differences in their opinions, they have generally regarded them as belonging to the same, Alexandrian, school of medicine.
The works of Galen are an important source of information on Erasistratus. They indicate that Herophilos and Erasistratus differed in their views on key aspects of medical theory and practice, and that there were two separate strands of medical thought in Alexandria at the time. A comprehensive analysis of Galen’s works enables us to form an idea of the approaches taken by Erasistratus and his followers to practical clinical objectives, while collating the information we have on them allows us to reconstruct his views. In the texts translated into Russian for the publication of  Galen’s works, we can trace the agreement between the views of Chrysippus of Knidos and Erasistratus. The evidence we have indicates that Erasistratus’s views formed the basis of the teaching of the Methodic doctors.
In the second part of this article, the author moves on to an analysis and historical/medical commentary on two of Galen’s works: “De Venae Sectione adversus Erasistratum”, and “De Venae Sectione adversus Erasistrateos Romae Degentes”,two of the main sources of information on the celebrated Alexandrian physician of the third century BC. The author puts forward arguments in support of his opinion that Erasistratus’s clinical practice should be seen as the basis of the teaching of the Methodic doctors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balalykin D.A. What do we know about Erasistratus?

Part 1. History of medicine. 2018; 5(1): 3–13.

Galen. O naznachenii chastey chelovecheskogo tela [The

Function of the Parts of the Body]. Ed. V.N. Ternovskiy.

Moscow, 1971. 554 p. (In Russ.)

Galen. Sochineniya. [Works]. Vol. I. Edited, compiled,

introduced, and annotated by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow:

Vest’, 2014. 656 p. (In Russ.)

Galen. Sochineniya. [Works]. Vol. II. Edited, compiled,

introduced, and annotated by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow:

Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2015. 800 p. (In Russ.)

Galen. Sochineniya. [Works]. Vol. III. Edited, compiled,

introduced, and annotated by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow:

Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2016. 560 p. (In Russ.)

Galen. Sochineniya. [Works]. Vol. IV. Edited, compiled,

introduced, and annotated by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow:

Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2017. 494 p. (In Russ.)

Galen. De venae sectione adversus Erasistrateos Romae

degentes. Еd. C. G. Kühn. In: Claudii Galeni Оpera Omnia.

Vol. 11. Leipzig: Knobloch, 1826 (repr.: Hildesheim: Olms,

. Р. 187–249. (Cod: 9, 371: Med.).

Galen. De Venae Sectione Adversus Erasistratum.

Ed. C.G. Kühn. In: Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia. Vol.

Leipzig: Knobloch, 1826 (repr. Hildesheim: Olms,

. Р. 147–186.

von Staden H. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early

Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

666 p.

Hippocrates. Izbrannye knigi [Selected books]. Transl.

from Greak V.I. Rudnev. Moscow: Biomedgiz, 1936.

p. (In Russ.)

Diels H. Ueber das physikalische System des Straton.

Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der

Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1893; 1: 101–127.

Longrigg J. Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and

Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. London:

Routledge, 1993.

Nutton V. Ancient Medicine. London; N.Y.: Routledge,

486 p.

Diogenes Laertrus. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh

znamenitykh filosofov [About life, teachings, and dicta of eminent

philosophers]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1979. 620 p. (In Russ.)

Balalykin D.A., Shok N.P. The Pythagoreansʼ

influence on medicine: a historical fact or problems of

interpretation? Part 1. History of Medicine. 2017; 4(3):

–308.

Balalykin D.A., Shok N.P. The Pythagorean influence

on medicine: a historical fact or a problem of

interpretation? Part 2. History of Medicine. 2017; 4(4):

–319.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A. Balalykin, D. (2018). What do we know about Erasistratus? Part 2. History of Medicine, 5(2). https://historymedjournal.com/HOM/index.php/medicine/article/view/212