The emergence of professional obstetric aid in Smolensk province in the 19th – early 20th century
Keywords:
history of obstetrics, social history of medicine, history of social aid, obstetricians, midwivesAbstract
With the use of interdisciplinary approach, the history (the origins and the development) of professional obstetric aid in Russian provinces (as exemplified by Smolensk Governorate) in 19th – early 20th century is reviewed. Professional obstetric aid was provided by learned midwives whose main activity consisted in assisting home delivery. In rural areas aid of this kind was provided by local midwives, who lacked special tracking.
The establishment of clinical obstetric aid in Russian provinces is connected with the emergence of zemstvos (local government bodies) in the 1860s. Newly opened maternity wards were not autonomous and functioned in local hospitals. In provinces,clinical obstetric aid was associated exclusively with pathological labor. Since the end of the 19th century, the number of maternity wards patients has been increasing, and their social make-up changing. The medicalization of clinical obstetric aid manifested itself in the increase in the number of surgical interventions. In the 1910s, more miscarriages and premature deliveries are registered, caused by a growing number of illegal abortions. In this regard, despite its criminal liability, even provincial doctors started to procure abortions on therapeutic grounds.
The sphere of obstetrics was not considered a priority. However, at the beginning of 20th century the authorities and philanthropic organizations have developed low budget forms of social aid in this sphere.
Downloads
References
Pushkareva N.L., Mitsyuk N.A. Rodovspomozhenie i
kul’tura detorozhdenija v novejshej zarubezhnoj istoriografii
(1975–2015) [The Tradition of Childbirth and Obstetrics
in Contemporary Western Historiography (1975–2015)].
Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic review].
; 4: 147–164. (in Russian).
Baranov D.A. Rodinnyj obrjad: vremja, prostranstvo,
dvizhenie [The ritual of childbirth: time, space, movement].
Rodiny, deti, povituhi v tradicij ah narodnoj kul’tury
[Childbirth, children, midwives in the tradition of folk
culture]. Moscow: RGGU. 2001. P. 9–30. (in Russian)
Shchepanskaja T.B. Mir i mif materinstva. Sankt-Peterburg,
-e gody [The world and the myth of motherhood.
Saint Petersburg, the 1990s]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie
[Ethnographic review]. 1994; 5: 17–25. (in Russian)
Kabakova G.I. Antropologij a zhenskogo tela v slavjanskoj
tradicii [Antropology of the female body in Slavonic
tradition]. Moscow: Ladomir, 2001. 335 p. (in Russian)
Mitsyuk N.A., Pushkareva N.L. Domashnie rody v
rossij skih dvorjanskih sem’jah (konets XIX – nachalo
XX v.) [Home birth in Russian Noble Families (Late 19th –
Early 20th Centuries)]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie
[Ethnographic review]. 2015; 5: 167–183. (in Russian)
Mitsyuk N.A., Pushkareva N.L. Modernizatsij a
reproduktivnogo povedenij a obrazovannyh rossij anok
vtoroj poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka [Modernization of
reproductive behavior of noblewomen in the second half of
the 19th – the beginning of the 20th century]. Zhenshhiny
v Rossij skom obshhestve [Women in Russian society].
; 3: 73–89. (in Russian)
Mukhina Z.Z., Pushkareva N.L. Dorodovoj period i rody
v zhizni krest’janki poreformennoj Rossii [Prenatal period
and childbirth in the life of a peasant in post-reform Russia].
Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta. Serij a: Istorij a. Politologij a [Bulletin of
Belgorod state University . Series: History. Politology.].
; 7: 161–168. (in Russian)
Danilishina E.I. Osnovnye etapy i napravlenij a razvitij a
otechestvennogo akusherstva (XVIII–XX vv.) [The main
stages and directions of development of domestic obstetrics
(18th–20th centuries)]. Avtoref. dis. d.m.n. Moscow,
48 p. (in Russian)
Novikova T.Ju. Mladenchestvo i stanovlenie
professional’nogo rodovspomozhenij a v Rossii [The infancy
and development of professional maternity care in Russia].
Pediatria [Pediatric]. 2016; 1: 147–150. (in Russian)
Yakovenko T.G. Set rodovspomogatelnykh uchrezhdenij v
Petrograde k 1917 godu [The chain of obstetric facilities
in Petrograd by 1917]. Zhurnal akusherstva I zhenskikh
boleznej [Journal of obstetrics and gynaecological
diseases]. 2005; LIV (2): 99–103. (in Russian)
Balalykin D.A. Anamnesis morbi ili anamnesis tubi?
K voprosu o metodah i metodologii istoriko-medicinskogo
issledovanij a [Anamnesis morbi or anamnesis tubi? On the
issue of the methods and methodology of the history
of medicine research]. Istorij a mediciny [History of
medicine]. 2017; 2: 136–151. (in Russian)
Gruzdev V.S. Kratkij ocherk istorii akusherstva i
ginekologii v Rossii [A short history of obstetrics and
gynecology in Russia]. Akushersko-ginekologicheskie
uchrezhdenij a Rossii. [Obstetric-gynecologic
institutions of Russia]. Saint Petersburg: Gos. tip.,
P. 5–76. (in Russian)
Donegan J. Women and Men Midwives. Westport,
Connecticut: Greenwood Press Inc., 1978. 234 p.
Donnison J. Midwives and Medical Men. New Barnett:
Historical Perspectives, 1988. 287 p.
Wilson W. The Making of Man-Midwifery: Childbirth
in England, 1660–1770. Ca mbridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1995. 239 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.