The Pythagorean influence on medicine: a historical fact or a problem of interpretation? Part 2
Keywords:
history of medicine, history of science, Pythagoreans, ancient philosophy, ancient Greek rational medicineAbstract
The authors of this article consider the influence of the Pythagoreans’ views on medicine. They justify two significant for the history and philosophy of medicine theses. The first one is the lack of influence of the Pythagoreans on the formation and development of an independent medical school. The second is the fallacy of the assertion that the medical views of some representatives of ancient medicine (the most famous of which is Alcmaeon) were formed solely under the influence of the ideas of the Pythagoreans. Alcmaeon, who is traditionally identified with the followers of the Pythagorean teaching, formed fundamental statements for further development of ancient Greek rational medicine (the thesis about the controlling role of the brain, etc.). The main argument against Alcmaeon’s attributing to the Pythagorean school is his idea of the central control function of the brain. In terms of the birth and development of medicine as a science, Alcmaeon is the direct predecessor of Hippocrates and Herophilus. The interdisciplinary approach, as well as authors’ scientific developments related to the reconstruction of the history and philosophy of ancient medicine, allow the authors to conclude that the Pythagorean doctrine has dual nature because of the rational and occult/magical elements in it. It is a serious reason for not overestimating the importance of Pythagorean philosophy for the development of medicine. Pythagorean teaching could not become a fundamental system of views, which was the basis for the formation of a picture of the world of the first generations of representatives of ancient Greek rational medicine and separate medical schools. However, this fact does not deny the possibility of influence of some Pythagorean ideas on the representatives of the ancient physicians in the broadest ideological sense.
Downloads
References
Balalykin D.A., Shok N.P. Vliyanie pifagoreytsev na
meditsinu: istoricheskiy fakt ili problemy interpretatsii?
Chast’1 [The Pythagoreansʼ influence on medicine: a
historical fact or problems of interpretation? Part 1].
History of Medicine. 2017; 4(3): 300–308. (in Russian)
Jones W.H.S. Philosophy and Medicine in Ancient Greece.
Baltimore, 1961.
Kahn С.H. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans. A Brief
History. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company,
206 p.
Kirk G., Raven J., Schofield M. The Presocratic
Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
518 p.
Longrigg J. Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and
Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. London, 1993.
Zhmud L.Ya. Pifagor i rannie pifagoreytsy [Pythagoras
and the early Pythagoreans]. Moscow: Universitet
Dmitriya Pozharskogo, 2012. 445 p. (in Russian)
Codellas P.S. Alcmaeon of Croton: His Life, Work,
and Fragments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of
Medicine. 1932; 25(7): 1041–1046.
Lloyd G.E.R. Alcmaeon and the Early History of
Dissection. Sudhoffs Archiv. 1975; 59: 113–147.
Lloyd G.E.R. Experiment in early Greek philosophy and
medicine. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological
Society. 1964; 10: 50–72.
Sigerist H.E. A History of Medicine. Vol. 2, New York,
Timpanaro M.C. Pitagorici. Testimonianze e frammenti.
La Nuova Italia, Firenze, fasc. 1: 1958.
Hippocrates. Izbrannye knigi [Selected writings]. Edited,
introduced, and annotated by V.P. Karpov. Moscow:
Medgiz, 1936. (in Russian)
Jouanna J. The Birth of Western medical art. Western
Medical Thought from Antiquity to the Middle
Ages. Ed. by Mirko D. Grmek. Harvard Univ. Press:
CambridgeLondon, 1998. P. 22–71.
Grecheskaya filosofiya [Greek Philosophy]. Edited by
M. Kanto-Sperber. A translation from French. Moscow:
Greko-latinskiy kabinet Yu.A. Shichalina, 2006. (in Russian)
Nutton V. Ancient Medicine. London and New York:
Routledge, 2013.
Vlastos G. Isonomia. American Journal of Philology.
; 74: 337–366.
Aristotle. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh [Works in 4
volumes]. Vol. 1. Мoscow: Mysl, 1976. (in Russian)
Plato. Sobranie sochineniy v chetyrekh tomakh [Collected
works in 4 volumes]. Vol. III. Мoscow: Mysl, 1994.
р. (in Russian)
Galen. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. IV. Edited, compiled,
introduced, and annotated by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow:
Practicheskaya meditsina, 2017. (in Russian)
Diogenes Laertius. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh
znamenitykh filosofov [Lives, teachings, and dicta of eminent
philosophers]. Moscow: Mysl, 1979. 620 p. (in Russian)
Balalykin D.A. Meditsina Galena: traditsiya Gippokrata i
ratsional’nost’ antichnoy naturfilosofii [Galen’s medicine:
the Hippocratic tradition and rationality of ancient
natural philosophy]. In Galen. Sochineniya [Works].
Vol. 2. Edited, compiled, introduced, and annotated
by D.A. Balalykin. Moscow: Practicheskaya meditsina,
P. 5–106. (in Russian)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
