Vivisection Ancient and Modern1

Authors

  • Gary Ferngren Oregon State University (USA) 1500 SW Jefferson St. Corvallis, OR 97331 FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU MOH Russia (Sechenov University) 8 Trubetskaya St., building 2, Moscow 119991, Russia Author

Keywords:

Vivisection, dissection, Alcmaeon, Herophilus, German and Japanese vivisection, saviour siblings

Abstract

This paper addresses the debate over the practice of human vivisection, most notably as practiced in the ancient world by the Alexandrian physicians Herophilus and Erasistratus. No issue in Greek medicine attracted more intense dispute in the classical world than did vivisection, on the ethics of which Greek physicians were divided. Moreover, there was a widespread, culturally rooted  repugnance  towards  experimentation  on  the  human  body  in  ancient  Greek  and  Roman  society,  which  applied  to dissection of cadavers as well as vivisection, and hampered the development of scientific progress in medical care. Patients neither expected nor desired their physicians to be what we call “scientists” today; they expected care based on a theoretical rather than experimental understanding of the body. While the practice of vivisection was debated by the medical sects of the Dogmatists and the Empiricists, public hostility to vivisection never diminished and it fueled an already-existing popular criticism of physicians.
he issue became the focus of Pseudo-Quintilian’s Declamation 8, a rhetorical exercise in which the father of twins consents for one son to be vivisected to save the life of the other. The declamation explores the ethical issues in a detailed manner that, while fictional, is unparalleled in classical medical literature. The paper goes on to survey vivisection in the modern world by briefly examining its use by German and Japanese physicians prior to and during World War II. Independently of each other, German and Japanese military leaders spearheaded medical research programs in which prisoners were vivisected by surgeons in training or exposed to life-threatening conditions in studies of the human body’s response to various stresses. Although the goal of such research was in part the improvement of medical care for German and Japanese soldiers, scholars today question the scientific validity of the experiments based both on the haphazard record-keeping of the programs and on ethical dilemmas concerning the use of the resultant data. The paper concludes by describing a medical controversy analogous to but milder than vivisection,concerning children known as “saviour siblings”, who are conceived for the express purpose of subsequently bequeathing their organs or cells to a genetically related sibling who suffers from a fatal disease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ferngren G. Medicine and Religion: A Historical

Introduction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University

Press, 2014. P. 14–35.

Lloyd G.E.R. Experiment in early Greek philosophy and

medicine // Proc. Cambridge Philo. Soc. 1964; n.s. 10:

–72.

Lloyd G.E.R. The role of medicine in the development

of early Greek science // Lampas. 1975; 8: 327–333.

Lloyd G.E.R. Magic, Reason and Experience.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1979.

von Staden H. Experiment and experience in Hellenistic

medicine // Bull. Inst. Class. Stud. 1975; 22: 178–199.

Ferngren G. Roman Lay Attitudes Towards Medical

Experimentation // Bull. Hist. Med. 1985; 59: 495–505.

Edelstein L. The History of Anatomy in Antiquity //

Ancient Medicine. Owsei Temkin, Lilian Temkin

(eds.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

: 247–301.

Lloyd G.E.R. Alcmaeon and the early history

of dissection // Sudhoffs Archiv: Zeitschrift für

Wissenschaftsgeschichte. 1975; 59: 113–147.

von Staden H. The Discovery of the Body: Human

Dissection and Its Cultural Contexts in Ancient Greece

// The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 1992; 65:

–241.

von Staden H. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in

Early Alexandria. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge

University Press, 1989.

Celsus. De medicina / Trans. W.G. Spencer // Loeb

Classical Library. Vol. 1. London: William Heinemann,

Aristotle. De Partibus Animalium / Trans. A.L. Peck. //

Loeb Classical Library. London: William Heinemann,

Edelstein L. The Hippocratic Physician // Ancient

Medicine. Owsei Temkin, Lilian Temkin (eds.). Baltimore:

Johns Hopkins University Press. 1967: 87–110.

Guerrini A. Experimenting with Humans and Animals:

From Galen to Animal Rights. Baltimore: Johns

Hopkins University Press, 2003.

Temkin O. The Double Face of Janus. Baltimore: Johns

Hopkins University Press, 1977.

Gibson C.A. Doctors in Ancient Greek and Roman

Rhetorical Education // Journal of the History of

Medicine and Allied Sciences. 2013; 68(4): 529–550.

Håkanson L. Declamationes XIX maiores Quintiliano

falso ascriptae. Stuttgart, 1982.

Quintiliani quae feruntur declamationes (maiores) /

Ed. G. Lehnert. Leipzig: Teubner, 1908.

[Quintiliano] I gemelli malati: un caso di vivisezione

(Declamazioni maggiori 8) / Trans. and ed. Stramaglia

A. Cassino: Edizioni dell’Universita degli Studi di

Cassino, 1999.

Sussman L.A. The Major Declamations Ascribed to

Quintilian: A Translation. Frankfurt am Main, Bern,

New York: Verlag Peter Lang, 1987.

Bernstein N.W. Bodies, Substances and Kinship in

Roman Declamation: The Sick Twins and Their Parents

in Pseudo-Quintilian Major Declamations 8 // Ramus:

Critical Studies in Greek and Roman Literature. 2007;

(2): 118–142.

Ferngren G. A Roman Declamation on Vivisection.

Transactions and Studies. 1982; IV (4): 280–289.

Kei-ichi T. Unit 731 and the Human Skulls Discovered

in 1989: Physicians Carrying Out Organized Crimes

// Dark Medicine: Rationalizing Unethical Medical

Research / Eds. Lafleur W.R. et al. Bloomington:

Indiana University Press, 2007: 73–84.

Kei-ichi T. Unit 731 and the Japanese Imperial Army’s

biological warfare program / Trans. J. Junkerman //

Japan’s Wartime Medical Atrocities / Eds. Jing-Bao N.,

Nanyan G., Selden M., Kleinman A. New York:

Routledge, 2010: 23–31.

Japan’s Wartime Medical Atrocities: Comparative

Inquiries in Science, History, and Ethics / Eds. Kleinman

A., Jing-Bao N., Selden M. New York: Routledge, 2010.

Masaaki N. Japanese Atrocities in the Pacific War: One

Army Surgeon’s Account of Vivisection on Human

Subjects in China / Trans. P.G. Schalow // East Asia:

An International Quarterly. 2000; 18(3).

Nanyan G. Discovering Traces of Humanity: Taking

Individual Responsibility for Medical Atrocities //

Japan’s Wartime Medical Atrocities / Eds. Jing-Bao N.,

Nanyan G., Selden M., Kleinman A. New York:

Routledge, 2010: 107–122.

Bärnighausen T. Barbaric Research – Japanese

Human Experiments in Occupied China: Relevance;

Alternatives; Ethics // Man, Medicine, and the State

/ Ed. W.U. Eckart. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag,

Roland Ch. Human Vivisection: The Intoxication

of Limitless Power in Wartime // Prisoners of War

and Their Captors in World War II / Eds. B. Moore,

K. Fedorowich. Oxford: Berg, 1996.

Roland C.G. Vivisection. Encyclopedia of Prisoners

of War and Internment. Millerton: Grey House Pub.,

Mozes-Kor E. The Mengele Twins and Human

Experimentation: A Personal Account // Nazi Doctors

and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human

Experimentation / Eds. G.J. Annas, M.A. Gordin.

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Segal N.L. Twin Research at Auschwitz-Birkenau:

Implications for the Use of Nazi Data Today // When

Medicine Went Mad: Bioethics and the Holocaust. Ed.

Arthur L. Caplan. Totowa: Humana Press, 1992: 281–299.

Berger R.L. Nazi Science – the Dachau Hypothermia

Experiments // The New England Journal of Medicine.

; 322 (20): 1435–1440.

Taylor-Sands M. Saviour Siblings and Collective Family

Interests // Monash Bioethics Review. 2010; 29(2):

1–12.15.

Madanamoothoo A. Saviour-Sibling and the

Psychological, Ethical and Judicial Issues that It

Creates: Should English and French Legislators Close

the Pandora’s Box? // European Journal of Health Law.

; 18: 293–303.

Sheldon S., Wilkinson S. Should Selecting Saviour

Siblings Be Banned? // Journal of Medical Ethics.

; 30(6): 533–537.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles