Aristotle’s ethics and politics: eflections on bioethics and the contemporary state

Authors

  • Ana Iltis Wake Forest University, Department of Philosophy, Center for Bioethics, Health & Society Tribble Hall B301, P.O. Box 7332, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA Author

Keywords:

ristotle, bioethics, common morality, ethics, polis, politics

Abstract

For Aristotle, ethics and politics are inseparable. The polis is essential to fostering the good life and exists for a moral purpose. Contemporary bioethics in the West reflects an account of the state that, like Aristotle’s state, has a substantial role to play in enforcing an account of the good life. Bioethics in the West has its origins largely in the political setting and remains politically oriented. Efforts to describe a common morality that transcends particular religious commitments dominate much of the bioethics literature and the work of public bioethics. Such efforts have failed, resulting in a politically active bioethics that seeks to use the authority of the state to enforce a particular account of the good life. This account of the good life rejects and undermines many religious commitments, despite claiming to be universal and neutral. This happens both at the national level and at the international level through various organizations such as the United Nations. In the West, we inherited a view from Aristotle that politics and ethics are intimately connected and that the state should foster the good life. This view of the state has been applied inappropriately in light of the fact that the contemporary state has little in common with Aristotle’s polis. We should be cautious of contemporary bioethics’ efforts to promulgate a common morality through the secular state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle. The Politics. Translated by C.D.C. Reeve.

Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1998.

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated and edited by

Terry Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1999.

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113. 1973.

Hunter, James Davison. Culture wars: The struggle

to control the family, art, education, law, and politics in

America. Basic Books, 1992.

Jonsen A.R. The birth of bioethics. Oxford University

Press, 2003.

In re Quinlan (70 N.J. 10, 355 A.2d 647 (NJ 1976).

Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to

Examine the Definition of Brain Death. A Definition

of Irreversible Coma. Journal of the American Medical

Association. 1968; 205: 337–340.

President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical

Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral

Research, 1981, Defining Death: Medical, Legal and

Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death, Washington,

DC: Government Printing Office.

National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform

State Laws. Uniform Determination of Death Act. Available

online: http://www.uniformlaws.org/ActSummary.

aspx?title=Determination%20of%20Death%20Act.

Jones J.H. Bad blood. Simon and Schuster, 1993.

National Research Act, Public Law. 1974: 93–348.

National Commission for the Protection of Subjects of

Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Belmont Report:

Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of

Human Subjects of Research, 1979.

Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. Principles of biomedical

ethics. 6th ed. Oxford University Press, 2009.

Engelhardt H.T., Jr. Public discourse and reasonable

pluralism: Rethinking the requirements of neutrality. In:

Guinn D.E. (ed.). Handbook of bioethics and religion.

Oxford University Press, 2006: 169–194.

North Coast Women’s Medical Group, Inc. et al. v.

Guadalupe T. Benitez 44 Cal. 4th 1145, 189 P. 3d 959,

Cal. Rptr. 3d 708.

LaPlante J. Tough times for Catholic adoption agencies.

OSV Newsweekly. May 7, 2014.

United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the

Child. Geneva: United Nations, 1989.

Weithorn L.A., Campbell S.B. The competency of

children and adolescents to make informed treatment

decisions. Child development. 1982; 53: 1589–1598.

Weithorn L.A. Children’s capacities to decide about

participation in research. IRB. 1983: 1–5.

Partridge B.C. The decisional capacity of the adolescent:

an introduction to a critical reconsideration of the doctrine

of the mature minor. Journal of medicine and philosophy.

; 38 (3): 249–255.

Steinberg, Laurence. Does recent research on adolescent

brain development inform the mature minor doctrine?

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2013; 38 (3):

–267.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Iltis, A. (2015). Aristotle’s ethics and politics: eflections on bioethics and the contemporary state. History of Medicine, 2(4). https://historymedjournal.com/HOM/index.php/medicine/article/view/106