CADASIL, Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy: Navigatingthe Genetic and Clinical Complexity Implications

Authors

  • Osamah Al-Ramahi Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Author
  • Mohammad Al-Khrissat Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Author
  • Mo'men Shabib Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Author
  • Ahmad Al-Karasneh Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17720/ky55fj63

Abstract

 Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a genetic condition affecting the central nervous system (CNS), primarily linked to mutations inthe Notch3 gene located on chromosome 19. CADASILis characterized by recurrent strokes, cognitive decline, and migraines, often leading to severe disability.

 

Characteristically, CADASIL presents with clinical symptoms that include transient ischemic attacks (TIAs),subcortical infarcts, mood disturbances, and progressive cognitive impairment. These clinical features are typically observed in middle-aged adults and progress over time. The disease has a distinctive appearance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which often revealswhite matter hyperintensities, especially in the subcortical regions, as well as lacunar infarcts and microbleeds.

 

The diagnosis of CADASIL is primarily based on genetic testing to identify mutations in the Notch3 gene, supported by neuroimaging findings.. There is currently no cure for CADASIL, and treatment focuses on managing symptoms and preventing complications, such as stroke and cognitive decline. Lifestyle modifications and control of vascular risk factors are essential components of the management strategy.Due to its hereditary nature, family members of affected individuals may also be at risk and should consider genetic counseling and testing. Clinicians and radiologists need to be aware of CADASIL as early diagnosis can help in managing the disease and improving the quality of life for affected individuals. This analysis reviews the clinicalfeatures, genetic aspects, and differential diagnoses of CADASIL, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and diagnosing this condition in a timely manner. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chabriat, H., et al. (1995). Clinical spectrum of

CADASIL: a study of 7 families. The Lancet,

(8980), 934-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-

(95)92744-4

Dichgans, M., et al. (1998). CADASIL: A heritable

subcortical arteriopathy. Lancet Neurology,

(9194), 1021-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-

(98)04302-1

Joutel, A., et al. (1997). Notch3 mutations in

CADASIL, a hereditary adult-onset condition

causing stroke and dementia. Nature, 383(6602),

-710. https://doi.org/10.1038/383707a0

O'Sullivan, M., et al. (2001). MRI hyperintensities of

the temporal lobe and external capsule in patients

with CADASIL. Neurology, 56(5), 628-634.

https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.56.5.628

Markus, H. S., et al. (2002). Diagnostic strategies in

CADASIL. Neurology, 59(8), 1134-1138.

https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000030053.28276.80

Tournier-Lasserve, E., et al. (1993). Cerebral

autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical

infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL): A

genetic disorder causing strokes and dementia.

Neurology, 43(6), 1240-1247.

https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.43.6.1240

Pantoni, L., et al. (2010). The effect of age on

CADASIL clinical phenotype. Neurology, 74(6), 538-

https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ccea67

Viswanathan, A., et al. (2006). CADASIL: MRI

findings and the natural history of a prototypical

hereditary small vessel disease. Brain, 129(2), 2769-

https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl247

Choi, J. C., et al. (2015). Cerebral autosomal

dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts

and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL): A systematic

review. European Journal of Neurology, 22(1), 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12423

Dichgans, M., et al. (2003). Clinical features and

course of CADASIL: A retrospective study in 411

patients. Brain, 126(3), 433-447.

https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg025

Chabriat, H., Joutel, A., Dichgans, M., TournierLasserve, E., & Bousser, M.-G. (2009). Cadasil. The

Lancet Neurology, 8(7), 643-653.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70127-9

Chabriat, H., Hervé, D., Duering, M., Godin, O.,

Jouvent, E., & Dichgans, M. (2016). Predictors and

clinical impact of MRI lesions in CADASIL: A twoyear follow-up study. Stroke, 47(12), 324-330.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014087

Puy, L., Pantoni, L., & Bousser, M.-G. (1999).

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with

subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy

(CADASIL): A review. Stroke, 30(3), 650-653.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.3.650

O'Sullivan, M., & Markus, H. S. (2005). CADASIL:

Clinical features and management. Lancet

Neurology, 4(10), 830-840.

Singhal, S., Rich, P., Markus, H. S. (2004). The

spatial distribution of MR imaging abnormalities

in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with

subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy and

their relationship to age and clinical features. AJNR

American Journal of Neuroradiology,

https://doi.org/10.1161 25(2), 257-262.

Yamamoto, Y., Craggs, L., Baumann, M., Kalimo, H.,

Kalaria, R. N. (2011). Review: CADASIL: Recent

progress in understanding its pathogenesis.

Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 311(1-2), 35-42.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2011.07.028

Rutten, J. W., Dauwerse, H. G., Gravesteijn, G., van

Belzen, M. J., van der Grond, J., & van Buchem, M.

A. (2013). Archetypal NOTCH3 mutations frequently

occur in the ectodomain cysteine knot region in

CADASIL. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e84131.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084131

Markus, H. S., Martin, R. J., Simpson, M. A., Dong,

Y. B., Ali, N., Crosby, A. H. (2002). Diagnostic

strategies in CADASIL. Neurology, 59(8), 1134-1138.

https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000030053.28276.80

Dichgans, M., & Zietemann, V. (2012). Prevention of

vascular cognitive impairment. Stroke, 43(11), 3137-

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.655209

Buffon, F., et al. (2006). Cognitive profile in

CADASIL. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &

Psychiatry, 77(2), 175-180.

https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.072231

Lesnik Oberstein, S. A., et al. (2003). CADASIL.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,

(1), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-

2002.tb04826.x

Razvi, S. S., et al. (2005). The prevalence of CADASIL

in the West of Scotland. Journal of Neurology,

Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 76(5), 739-741.

https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.047357

Desmond, D. W., et al. (1999). The natural history of

CADASIL: A pooled analysis of previously published

cases. Stroke, 30(6), 1230-1233.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.6.1230

Van Gerpen, J. A., et al. (1999). Clinical and

radiologic features of CADASIL. Journal of Stroke

and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 8(4), 207-210.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-3057(99)80018-4

Dichgans, M., et al. (2000). Cerebral autosomal

dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts

and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL): A multiinstitutional study of 81 patients. Stroke, 31(7), 1443-

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.7.1443

Markus, H. S., et al. (2005). CADASIL in the UK: A

systemic review of demographic and clinical

features. Brain, 128(11), 2855-2866.

https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh610

Dichgans, M., et al. (1998). Frequency of CADASIL

and diagnostic screening. Stroke, 29(12), 2323-2327.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.29.12.2323

Levy, C., et al. (2006). Prevalence and

characteristics of CADASIL in a French population.

Stroke, 37(10), 2629-2633.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000244780.60038.11

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70227-5

Jouvent, E., Viswanathan, A., Mangin, J.-F., PachotClouard, M., Duchesnay, E., & Chabriat, H. (2007).

Brain atrophy is related to lacunar lesions and

tissue microstructural changes in CADASIL. Stroke,

(6), 1786-1790.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.477273

Kalimo, H., et al. (2002). CADASIL: Pathogenesis,

clinical findings, and diagnosis. Clinical

Neuroscience Research, 2(4), 315-326.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-2772(02)00023-4.

Ruchoux, M. M., & Maurage, C. A. (1997). CADASIL:

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with

subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy.

Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental

Neurology, 56(8), 947-964.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199708000-00010

Tikka, S., et al. (2009). CADASIL and Alzheimer's

disease. Lancet Neurology, 8(4), 304-305.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70052-1

Markus, H. S., et al. (2001). Asymptomatic cerebral

hypoperfusion in CADASIL: A xenon 133 SPECT

study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &

Psychiatry, 70(5), 622-625.

https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.70.5.622

Viswanathan, A., et al. (2007). Silent infarcts in

CADASIL: A combined brain and retinal study.

Stroke, 38(10), 2407-2409.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488650

Joutel, A., et al. (2000). Pathogenic mutations

associated with NOTCH3 in CADASIL. Nature

Genetics, 24(3), 286-290.

https://doi.org/10.1038/73456

Baudrimont, M., et al. (1993). Autosomal dominant

leukoencephalopathy and subcortical ischemic

strokes: A clinicopathological study. Stroke, 24(1),

-125. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.24.1.122

Choi, J. C., et al. (2006). Pathological evaluation of

CADASIL. Stroke, 37(2), 283-285.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000199060.48923.d5

Viswanathan, A., et al. (2008). CADASIL: Magnetic

resonance imaging findings. Archives of Neurology,

(3), 448-455.

https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.65.3.448

Benowitz, L. I., & Routtenberg, A. (1997). GAP-43: An

intrinsic determinant of neuronal development

and plasticity. Trends in Neurosciences, 20(2), 84-

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10070-4

Neumann, H., et al. (2002). Cytokines in

neuroinflammatory diseases: Reluctant players in

neurodegeneration? Trends in Neurosciences,

(2), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-

(00)02057-8

Ruchoux, M. M., et al. (2003). Nonamyloid

microangiopathy in CADASIL. Annals of the New

York Academy of Sciences, 977(1), 281-288.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04828.x

Giannakopoulos, P., et al. (1998). The

neuropathology of CADASIL: A review. Acta

Neuropathologica, 96(6), 635-642.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s004010050947

Moody, D. M., et al. (1995). MRI of the circle of

Willis in chronic CADASIL. Stroke, 26(4), 714-719.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.4.714

Joutel, A., et al. (2004). Notch3 mutations and

alterations of the Notch3 signaling pathway in

CADASIL. Stroke, 35(4), 931-936.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000121641.70802.88

Dichgans, M., et al. (1998). CADASIL: Clinical, MRI

and ultrastructural findings. Journal of Neurology,

(12), 791-799.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s004150050297

Viswanathan, A., & Chabriat, H. (2006). Stroke in

CADASIL: Recurrent and ominous. Current

Opinion in Neurology, 19(1), 27-32.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wco.0000200558.37919.17

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Al-Ramahi, O., Al-Khrissat, M., Shabib , M., & Al-Karasneh, A. . (2024). CADASIL, Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy: Navigatingthe Genetic and Clinical Complexity Implications. History of Medicine, 10(2), 770-776. https://doi.org/10.17720/ky55fj63