Antibiotic resistance profile of Salmonella typhimurium isolated from poultry chicken and domestic goat in Punjab, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48047/HM.10.2.2024.1761-1770Keywords:
Goat, Chicken, Salmonella typhimurium, Antibiotics, Resistance, PakistanAbstract
Salmonella is the main source of foodborne diseases and internal microorganisms as the species S. typhi and S. enteritidis. From poultry and animals, it is transferred in different ways like poultry feed, air, debris, unhealthy environments and vectors such as insects, rodents, and human beings. Objectives: This study focuses on determining the prevalence of S. typhi in goats and chickens. and to assess antibiotic susceptibility patterns for different antibiotics used against S. typhi. Methods: Numerous stool samples were collected from various locations on animal and poultry farms for Salmonella isolation, Salmonellosis emerges as a highly impactful disease-causing significant mortality in goats and chickens. The study employs various culture-based methods for the pathogenicity of Salmonella. Antibiotics including Oxacillin, Ceftazidime, Nitrofurantoin, Ofloxacin, and Nalidixic acid are employed to measure the zone of inhibition, susceptibility, and resistance patterns. Results: It was found that salmonella typhi was obtained during the experimental trial. Different antibiotics show different results including Nitrofurantoin, Ceftazidime, and Ofloxacin (5 µg) are identified as effective antibiotics for treating bacterial infections in chickens. Nitrofurantoin and Ofloxacin are deemed suitable for treating bacterial infections in goats, while caution is advised against the use of Oxacillin and Ceftazidime due to observed resistance patterns. Conclusions: The study concludes that antibiotics like nitrofurantoin and ofloxacin are effective in treating bacterial infections in goats, while nitrofurantoin, ceftazidime, and ofloxacin (5 µg) are recommended for chickens. Furthermore, the overuse of medicines in the field of animal husbandry emerges as a significant concern for human health.
Downloads
References
Romane, A., R. Harrak, and F.J.S.A.d.f.p.E.M. Bahri, BSM 1t ed., Published by InTech, Croatia. Pp, Use thyme essential oils for the prevention of salmonellosis. 2012: p. 305-332.
Williams, G.C. and R.M.J.T.Q.r.o.b. Nesse, The dawn of Darwinian medicine. 1991. 66(1): p. 1-22.
Chlebicz, A., K.J.I.j.o.e.r. Śliżewska, and p. health, Campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis, yersiniosis, and listeriosis as zoonotic foodborne diseases: a review. 2018. 15(5): p. 863.
Franco, B.E., et al., The determinants of the antibiotic resistance process. 2009: p. 1-11.
Damborg, P., et al., Bacterial zoonoses transmitted by household pets: state-of-the-art and future perspectives for targeted research and policy actions. 2016. 155(1): p. S27-S40.
Oosterom, J.J.I.J.o.F.M., Epidemiological studies and proposed preventive measures in the fight against human salmonellosis. 1991. 12(1): p. 41-51.
Overgaauw, P.A., et al., A one health perspective on the human–companion animal relationship with emphasis on zoonotic aspects. 2020. 17(11): p. 3789.
Manie, et al., Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from slaughtered and retail chickens in South Africa. 1998. 26(4): p. 253-258.
Hardy, B.J.A.b., The issue of antibiotic use in the livestock industry: what have we learned? 2002. 13(1): p. 129-147.
Aneja, K., Experiments in microbiology, plant pathology and biotechnology. 2007: New Age International.
Grimont, P., et al. Ewingella americana gen. nov., sp. nov., a new Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. in Annales De l'Institut Pasteur/Microbiologie. 1983. Elsevier.
Drew, W.L., et al., Reliability of the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for detecting methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. 1972. 24(2): p. 240-247.
Tanner, K., The lived experience of adults with dyslexia: An exploration of the perceptions of their educational experiences. 2010, Murdoch University.
Alexander, K.A., L.D. Warnick, and M.J.V.r.c. Wiedmann, Antimicrobial resistant Salmonella in dairy cattle in the United States. 2009. 33: p. 191-209.
Umeh, S.I. and C.P.J.O.J.o.M.M. Enwuru, Antimicrobial resistance profile of Salmonella isolates from livestock. 2014. 4(04): p. 242.
Musgrove, M., et al., Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolated from commercial shell eggs. 2006. 85(9): p. 1665-1669.
Kasimoglu Dogru, A., et al., Serotype identification and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken carcasses. 2010. 42: p. 893-897.
de Oliveira, F.A., et al., Characterization of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from human samples. 2012. 45(2): p. 1000-1003.
Mathole, M., et al., Presence, distribution, serotypes and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella among pigs, chickens and goats in South Africa. 2017. 72: p. 219-224.
Herawati, O., et al., The global profile of antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated from goats and sheep: A systematic review. 2023. 16(5).
Tjaniadi, P., et al., Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens associated with diarrheal patients in Indonesia. 2003. 68(6): p. 666-670.
Asfaw Ali, D., B. Tadesse, and A.J.I.J.o.M. Ebabu, Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella isolated from caecal contents of exotic chicken in Debre Zeit and Modjo, Ethiopia. 2020. 2020.
Maciel, W.C., et al., Isolation and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica (O: 6, 8) in broiler chickens. 2016. 44: p. 1-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Iqra Asghar, Shazia Asghar, Fouzia Tanvir, Saba Munir, Yasir Nawaz (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
