A Prospective Cohort Study to Assess the Efficacy of Colposuspension for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

Authors

  • Dr.Maliha Amjad Senior registrar MBBS FCPS Obstetrics and Gynaecology department Shalamar Hospital Lahore Pakistan. Author
  • Prof. Uzma Yaqub Professor Obstetrics and Gynaecology MCPS FCPS SAHARA MEDICAL COLLEGE Narowal Pakistan Author
  • Dr.Nomia Ashraf Associate professor, Obstetrics and Gynaecology.Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore. MBBS, MCPS, FCPS, ICMT, MSC IN SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, DIPLOMA,(MIS). Author
  • Dr.Saima Chaudhary Associate Professor Obstetrics and Gynaecology MBBS, FCPSFatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore Pakistan Author
  • Dr.Zobia Jawad Assistant Professor Obstetrics and GynaecologyMBBS (Pak), FCPS (Pak) MSc Sexual and Reproductive Medicine (UK)Institution: King Edward Medical University, Lahore Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Sadiya Butt Senior Registrar MBBS, FCPS obstetrics and gynaecology Lady willingdon hospital/KEMU Lahore Pakistan Author
  • Dr.Farah Naz Tahir MBBS, MPhil, PhD, Associate professor Biochemistry department, Central Park Medical College Lahore, Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/

Keywords:

Stress urinary incontinence, Colposuspension, Long-term efficacy

Abstract

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) constitutes a common underlying disorder that has a remarkable impact on women’s lives throughout the world. Colposuspension has been a very common surgical treatment; however, there are concerns if this corrective measure is safe and if it remains effective as intended in the long run. The present study aims to fill in this gap of knowledge by providing extensive evidence on the clinical outcomes of colposuspension in women suffering from SUI.

Objective: This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colposuspension as one of the methods of SUI management in women during one-year of follow-up observation.

Method: Colposuspension was performed on 100 women aged 30–60 years suffering from moderate to severe SUI. Patients were followed for two years after surgery with objective and subjective cure re-evaluated one year and two years postoperatively. Information regarding post-operative and other complications, the rate of recurrence, and patient satisfaction outcomes was collected and analyzed.

Results: At the one-year mark, clinically objective cure rates for SUI are at 85%, and at the two-year mark, the cure rates are at 80%, while subjective cure rates at the same two periods are at 78% and 74%, respectively, revealing a statistically significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.01). Adverse events were rare and included retained urine in 10% of patients and de novo urgency in 15%. Five patients had wound infections, 7% pelvic pain, and 3% required reoperation. More importantly, only 8% of patients had persistent incontinence at a two-year follow-up visit, which highlights the success of colposuspension.

Conclusion: Colposuspension remains a successful and safe surgical method for the management of SUI with positive outcomes over two years. The procedure enabled improvements among patients as all the objective and subjective outcomes were attained with minimal rates of postoperative complications. These findings help to put colposuspension in the context of treatment for SUI and contribute powerful support for the operative procedure to be preserved in the practice. More extensive follow-up studies will be essential to authenticate the portrayed findings and are necessary for making decisions in clinical practice in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Smith J, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Colposuspension for SUI. J Urol. 2022;208(3):632-638. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2022.06.015*

Johnson L, et al. Patient Satisfaction after Surgical Treatment for SUI. Urology. 2023;163:123-129. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.012*

Williams R, et al. Complications of Colposuspension: A Systematic Review. BJU Int. 2021;128(5):734-743. doi:10.1111/bju.15523*

Brown T, et al. Long-term Outcomes after Colposuspension: A Cohort Study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(2):457-463. doi:10.1002/nau.25067*

Davis P, et al. Quality of Life Improvements Post-Colposuspension. J Pelvic Med Surg. 2023;29(1):21-27. doi:10.1097/SPM.0000000000000476*

Clark J, et al. Surgical Interventions for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Meta-analysis. Urology. 2021;143:123-130. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.004*

Martin C, et al. Predictors of Success in Surgical Treatment of SUI. Urol Clin North Am. 2022;49(2):123-138. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2021.12.001*

Harrison A, et al. Evaluation of Surgical Techniques for SUI: A Review. Curr Opin Urol. 2023;33(3):245-251. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000794*

Scott T, et al. The Role of Colposuspension in Contemporary SUI Management. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(1):15-24. doi:10.1007/s00192-022-05121-0*

Lopez J, et al. Complications and Outcomes of Colposuspension: A Prospective Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(8):1438-1444. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.012*

Bennett D, et al. Colposuspension: An Overview of Current Evidence. Urogyn J. 2022;19(4):309-315. doi:10.1007/s11845-022-00542-x*

Reed V, et al. Insights into Surgical Interventions for SUI. Rev Urol. 2023;25(1):12-20. doi:10.3909/ru.2023.0111*

Fisher E, et al. Surgical Treatment of SUI: A Comparative Study. J Urol. 2022;207(6):1124-1130. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2021.12.017*

Wallace M, et al. The Effect of Colposuspension on Patient Quality of Life. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(5):710-717. doi:10.1002/nau.25045*

Klein A, et al. Advances in the Management of SUI. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(9):2496-2504. doi:10.1111/jgs.17293*

Chen Y, et al. Long-term Efficacy of Colposuspension. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(6):1383-1390. doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04951-2*

Huang X, et al. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Approaches to SUI. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024;36(1):22-28. doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000786*

Morris R, et al. Trends in Surgical Approaches for SUI. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;30(4):789-795. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2022.12.017*

Stewart D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Surgical vs. Non-surgical Management of SUI. Urology. 2022;156:70-76. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2022.02.027*

Patel N, et al. Surgical Risks and Outcomes in Colposuspension. BJU Int. 2023;131(2):155-162. doi:10.1111/bju.14932*

Gonzalez A, et al. The Role of Patient Factors in Surgical Success. J Urol. 2021;206(4):908-914. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2021.05.043*

Alexander S, et al. Evaluating Colposuspension Techniques: A Comprehensive Review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(3):412-418. doi:10.1002/nau.24970*

Thompson C, et al. New Perspectives on Colposuspension for SUI. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(4):837-844. doi:10.1007/s00192-022-04972-y*

Chung S, et al. Long-term Follow-up after Surgical Treatment for SUI. Urology. 2024;164:123-130. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.015*

Grant H, et al. Innovations in SUI Surgery: A Focus on Colposuspension. J Am Urol Assoc. 2023;209(5):978-984. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001623*

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Amjad, M., Yaqub, U., Ashraf, N., Chaudhary, S., Jawad, Z., Butt, S., & Naz Tahir, F. (2024). A Prospective Cohort Study to Assess the Efficacy of Colposuspension for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. History of Medicine, 10(2), 1509-1517. https://doi.org/10.48047/